added some styling and doc adjustements
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Then, call the `AXES_SHAPER_CALIBRATION` macro and look for the graphs in the re
|
||||
#### Generalities
|
||||
|
||||
To effectively analyze input shaper graphs, there is no one-size-fits-all approach due to the variety of factors that can impact the 3D printer's performance or input shaper measurements. However, here are some hints on reading the graphs:
|
||||
- A graph with a **single and thin peak** well detached from the background noise is ideal, as it can be easily filtered by input shaping. But depending on the machine and its mechanical configuration, it's not always possible to obtain this shape. The key to getting better graphs is a clean mechanical assembly with a special focus on the rigidity and stiffness of everything, from the table through the frame of the printer to the toolhead.
|
||||
- A graph with a **single and thin peak** well detached from the background noise is ideal, as it can be easily filtered by input shaping. But depending on the machine and its mechanical configuration, it's not always possible to obtain this shape. The key to getting better graphs is a clean mechanical assembly with a special focus on the rigidity and stiffness of everything, from the table under the printer through the frame of the printer to the toolhead.
|
||||
- As for the belt graphs, **focus on the shape of the graphs, not the exact frequency and energy value**. Indeed, the energy value doesn't provide much useful information. Use it only to compare two of your own graphs and to measure the impact of your mechanical changes between two consecutive tests, but never use it to compare against graphs from other people or other machines.
|
||||
|
||||
When you are satisfied with your graphs, you will need to use the auto-computed values at the top to set the Input Shaping filters in your Klipper configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user